|
|
|
|
|
|
The Review can also be downlaoded here as an Adobe Acrobat file.
Review of the Scottish Accident Prevention Council
August 2006
Tony Graham Consulting
Fionallt
Loch Awe
Argyll
PA33 1AH
Contents
1. Introduction
2. The review of the Scottish Accident Prevention Council
3. SAPC – the current position
4. The future for SAPC – members’ views
5. Conclusions
6. Recommendations
7. Action Plan for implementation
Appendices
Appendix 1 – Recommended Structure
Appendix 2 – Suggested themes for SAPC work programme – 2007
Appendix 3 – SAPC business planning framework and budget/ cash flow 2007-2010
1. Introduction
The Scottish Accident Prevention Council was established in 1931 to promote greater awareness of the consequences of accidents in all aspects of everyday life and promote measures to reduce injury and fatality.
The Council is a membership organisation drawing on local authorities, health boards, emergency services and other organisations and individuals with an interest in safety and accident prevention, for its membership.
The Council has a close working relationship with the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA), which provides administrative support and the secretariat to the Council.
In the 75th anniversary of its founding, the Council commissioned an independent review to examine its current organisation, working arrangements and role.
This report details the findings, conclusions and recommendations of this review which was carried out between May and August 2006.
2. The review of Scottish Accident Prevention Council
2.1. Background
In April 2006, the SAPC commissioned an independent review of the Council with the aim of “identifying the current role of the SAPC with a view to producing recommendations for the way forward”. The study brief had a number of specific objectives
The study was planned as a relatively short and quick exercise, with a completion date of mid August and with an indicated time commitment of 10 consultant/days.
2.2. Our approach
In order to meet the objectives of the study within the timescales and resource commitments, our approach has combined a number of elements:
3. SAPC – the current position
3.1. Current structure of the SAPC
The SAPC is a membership organisation. It currently operates through three “standing” or “principal” committees dealing with
The Chairs of these three Committees along with the President, Vice President and Treasurer of SAPC form a small Executive Committee. (Currently the Vice President is also the Chair of the Home Safety Committee). The Principal Committees and the Executive are required in the Constitution to meet at least four times a year.
The Principal Committees and Executive are elected on a four year cycle which corresponds with Scottish Local Government Elections. The thinking behind this is that the majority of members of the SAPC are nominated by local authorities and, as representation is drawn from elected members, it was considered logical that the “lifespan” of the Council would coincide with the “lifespan” of the local authority.
The Principal Committees are (re)formed at the first AGM following the Local Government Elections and comprise representatives of the membership, with the number of place broadly in proportion to the organisational membership (and professional interests of the member) – see below.
| Member | Road Safety | Home Safety | Water and Leisure |
| Local Authorities | 40 | 30 | 30 |
| Health Boards | 1 | 2 | |
| Chief Fire Officers Association | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Scottish Executive Road Safety Branch | 1 | ||
| Scottish Home Safety Officers Group | 1 | ||
| Scottish Health Visitors Association | 1 | ||
| Institute of Trading Standards | 1 | ||
| Chief Officers of Trading Standards | 1 | ||
| Royal Environmental Health Institute | 1 | 1 | |
| Institute of Home Safety | 1 | ||
| Educational Institute of Scotland | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Child Injury Reporting and Prevention Programme | 1 | ||
| Association of Chief Police Officers | 1 | 1 | |
| Institute of Road Safety Officers | 1 | ||
| AA Motoring Trust | 1 | ||
| RAC Foundation | 1 | ||
| Living Streets | 1 | ||
| Scottish Cycling Council | 1 | ||
| Sportscotland | 1 | ||
| Institute of Sport and Recreation Management | 1 | ||
| Chief Officers of Cultural, Community and Leisure Services | 1 | ||
| Maritime and Coastguard Agency | 1 | ||
| Royal Life Saving Society | 1 | ||
| Convention of Scottish Local Authorities | 1 | ||
| British Waterways | 1 | ||
| Corporate Members | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Co-optees | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Total | 56 | 47 | 47 |
In addition the SAPC office bearers are ex-officio members of each committee.
In terms of legal structure, the SAPC is an unincorporated association i.e. an association of individuals and organisations but not incorporated (formed into a legally recognised and regulated company or society). The SAPC is a registered Scottish charity ( and as such, regulated by the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator).
The SAPC does not employ any staff. It is provided with administrative support including the secretariat of the Executive Committee and two of the principal committees – Road Safety and Home Safety by the staff of the Scottish office of RoSPA. The secretariat of Water and Leisure Safety Committee is provided on an “honorary” unpaid basis by one of its members.
3.2. Benefits of the SAPC
Members consulted and surveyed were invited to comment on the benefits of membership of the SAPC. Unsurprisingly views ranged considerably, from members who were enthusiastic about membership and its benefits to those who felt that there were “very little” benefits.
The main benefits of membership were
3.3. Services to members
SAPC provides a number of services to its members. The main services provided include:
3.3.1. SAPC Annual Conference
The SAPC holds a two day residential annual conference, focussing on a different theme each year. In our survey, almost two thirds of respondents indicated that they had attended this in the past three years. Of these, just over a half (53%) found the conference “very informative and useful”, with virtually all of the remaining respondents (44%) finding it “quite informative and useful”.
The conference planned by the Executive Committee with input from each of the standing committees. The conference attracts between 60-70 delegates.
3.3.2. SAPC Newsletter
The SAPC produces a regular newsletter for its members reporting on SAPC activities. Seventy five per cent of survey respondents indicated that they read the newsletter.
3.3.3. SAPC web site
The SAPC has developed a web site www.sapc.org.uk which contains details of its aims and objectives, its membership, the Executive Committee and the organisation’s constitution. It also contains the current issue of the SAPC newsletter, conference details and information on joining SAPC. Recent efforts have been made to include a “diary of events” publicising relevant events e.g. conferences, training courses organised by members and related organisations, but this has received a poor response. The web site also contains for downloading, copies of the SAPC general safety leaflet and its Water Safety Guide.
Consideration has been given to placing SAPC committee minutes on the web site, however this has been decided against.
The web site was designed and is administered by RoSPA staff. The number of “hits” i.e. times the web site is visited are recorded – showing an average of 40 “hits” a week (between March-June 2006).
In our survey, members were asked if that had visited the site (in the past six months). Almost 60% of respondents reported that they had with 30% of these finding it very useful and informative, 64% finding it quite useful and informative and 9% finding it not at all useful and informative.
3.4. Member involvement
Like many similar organisations, the SAPC is keen to involve as many members as possible in its activities. However, a common theme during consultation was the relatively low level of membership involved in either the SAPC Committee structure or in its other activities. Defining involvement is difficult. At its simplest, we looked at involvement in terms of attendance at the SAPC committee meetings.
We have also aimed to form a view on member involvement in relation to the development of the organisation and contributing to achieving its objectives, drawing on our one to one consultations.
In terms of committee involvement, we looked first at member attendance in the SAPC committees over the most recent five meetings of each principal committee and the Executive Committee.
| Executive* | Road Safety | Home Safety | Water & Leisure | |
| Membership Attendance Rate | 65% | 38% | 29% | 28% |
| Road Safety | Home Safety | Water & Leisure | |
| No. of members | 55 | 50 | 50 |
| No. “active” members | 35 | 34 | 27 |
| % attendance by “active” members | 58% | 45% | 49% |
| SAPC Activity | % of survey respondents involved |
| Committee Membership | 79% |
| Attend Annual Conference (in past 3 years) | 62% |
| Read newsletter | 75% |
| Visit Web Site | 34% |
| Schools Public Speaking contest | 42% |
| SAPC Awards | 36% |
The terms of reference for these three committees are:
a) To consider matters in relation to Road Safety/Home Safety/Water and Leisure Safety and to report to the Executive Committee
b) To formulate SAPC Policy in relation to Road Safety/Home Safety/Water and Leisure Safety
c) To promote and foster Road Safety/Home Safety/Water and Leisure Safety activities in Scotland.
Each Committee can appoint sub-committees as they consider necessary and consider their reports and recommendations.
Committee meetings are held on average four times a year. From a review of the minutes of the Committees’ meeting over the past year, the business of each committee can generally be divided into:
| i. | Briefing/input from visiting speakers |
| ii. | Consideration of “one off” items relating to the Committee’s terms of reference |
| iii. | Consideration on a continuing basis of items relating to the Committee’s terms of reference |
| iv. | Reports/discussions on SAPC business/organisational issues including the development of an SAPC Business Plan |
| v. | Reports from (national – UK) organisations with which SAPC is associated (National Road Safety Committee, National Home and Leisure Safety Committee, National Water Safety Forum) |
| vi. | Reports from SAPC Executive Committee |
| vii. | SAPC financial report. |
4. The future for SAPC – members’ views
In this section we draw on the members’ survey and the one to one consultations we held.
4.1. General
Inevitably, in a membership organisation with such a broad membership base, views will vary. On the one hand there are members who are very strong supporters and advocates for SAPC who feel that it is doing an excellent job. On the other there are members who feel that the organisation has outlived its usefulness. However, the majority of members are clustered somewhere in the middle of these two extremes. That SAPC has many positive qualities and attributes, but in a changing environment, it needs to refocus its energies and priorities and to make changes to the way it works.
As a context, one member when interviewed said “Safety, accident and injury prevention have never been more on the political agenda. In Scotland, with the Parliament and Executive, we have never been closer to the levers of power and influencing those who hold these. The potential for a body like SAPC is enormous”.
Members also recognised that there are now a lot more organisations and individuals involved in a wide range of activities designed to promote community safety. When the SAPC was formed and for much of its history, there were relatively few other bodies who had these concerns. A key issue for SAPC is - what will be the unique contribution it can make to reducing accidents and injury in Scotland?
About half of the members surveyed felt that SAPC is an “extremely“ valuable and useful organisation. Just under half (42%) felt it was “occasionally” valuable and useful. Only 7% felt it was of “no” value.
4.2. Strengths of the SAPC
Members were asked what they perceived as the main strengths of the SAPC. This produced a very diverse response, however the main recurring themes were:
The survey reflected the one to one consultations we held, with the over-riding theme being the lack of clear priorities and the resources and structures to follow these through.
4.4. Future direction and work
Members recognised that the organisation needs to change. Less than a quarter of respondents to the survey felt that the SAPC should “continue as it is”. The remaining three quarters indicated areas where they would want to see SAPC focus more on. In terms of the level of support/interest, members felt that they would like to see the SAPC:
5. Conclusions
In this section we set out our conclusions drawn from our review of SAPC.
5.1. General
It is clear that there is a continuing potential role for the SAPC. However, the environment in which it operates is more diverse and with more “players” than ever. The growing emphasis on Community Safety as a priority for government (Safer Communities in Scotland – Scottish Executive 1999) and communities, the development of multi-agency community safety partnerships is just one aspect of this. Our over-riding conclusion is that the SAPC has to make substantial changes in the way it operates, to have clearer organisational objectives and to put in place a number of measures to achieve these.
The potential of SAPC is far from being realised. With the membership base it has, the levels of expertise and commitment among the representatives not only in terms of the “technical” aspects of accident prevention but also in the political process needed to promote more effective measures, it is a potentially formidable organisation.
Our main conclusions are that as it currently operates, the SAPC:
5.2. SAPC aims and objectives
We conclude that there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the SAPC’s aims and objectives. However that these would benefit from a degree of streamlining and simplification. We feel however that the SAPC needs to focus on its role as a “secondary” organisation – by that we mean supporting agencies that are working directly with the public and communities to promote accident and injury prevention and not to try to take on this role itself, for which it does not have, and is unlikely to have the level of resources to fulfil effectively.
5.3. Current structure
We appreciate the historic reasons why the SAPC has developed as it has. This owes much to the role of local authorities in its formation and history and the comfort and familiarity that elected members have with a “committee“ based structure. However, we feel that the current structure does not work as well as it might. While the standing committees have clear terms of reference, there is little evidence that they underpin the work of each committee. With one or two exceptions there is little evidence of the standing committees developing SAPC policy and strategies to promote this. The standing committees membership is large and diverse, the meetings seem often to lack focus and in our view are trying to consider too many issues – often on an ad hoc basis. While they have a relatively small “core” membership, the lack of continuity from one meeting to the next is a weakness.
There is also a strong sense that each of the standing committees is “doing its own thing”. While this need not necessarily be a weakness, it means that a number of important “cross-cutting” issues do not get dealt with as effectively as they might. For example, the SAPC would benefit from having a clear “influencing” strategy – i.e. how does it get its message across most effectively regardless of issue.
5.4. Benefits of membership
While many members have commented on the benefits of membership, particularly in terms of “networking opportunities” and sharing of “good practice and information”, overall we found it difficult to quantify these. We conclude that the SAPC needs to have a clearer statement about the benefits that membership brings both to individual members directly, as well as spin-offs to them from the SAPC “policy influencing” role.
5.5. SAPC activities
We conclude that in particular, activities such as the Public Speaking Contest do not contribute to SAPC achieving its main objectives and require a disproportionate amount of time and resources for the benefits they produce.
While the Annual Awards have a certain value, we agree with some commentators that it is impossible to make a meaningful award to a project or initiative unless its impact and effectiveness have been fully evaluated. While we agree that there is a “PR” value in organising the Annual Awards, again we are not convinced that the work involved in this produces sufficient benefit for the SAPC or the promotion of Accident Prevention as a whole.
The Annual Conference is a valuable forum. It has the potential to include participation from the wider “Community Safety” community and become a much more important “event” on the calendar.
5.6. Relationship with RoSPA
The constitution of the SAPC says that it will be “allied to RoSPA” and that “the Council shall have regard to the general policy of RoSPA”
The relationship with RoSPA is in fact a complex one. The SAPC currently relies on RoSPA to provide it with administrative and secretariat support. There is a
need for greater clarity about both the service and policy relationship between the SAPC and RoSPA. In terms of the service relationship, greater clarity is needed in relation to the “executive” functions of RoSPA staff – how much is expected to carry out the execution and implementation of SAPC decisions and deliberations. We feel that there is a danger of the RoSPA staff being “the servants of two masters” with conflicting demands being placed on their time. There is a need for greater clarity about the time and work commitment of RoSPA staff to SAPC.
In relation to policy matters, we are not entirely clear what “having regard to the general policy of RoSPA” means in practice. If it means that any policy deriving from the SAPC has to agree or, at least not be at variance with RoSPA’s stance on matters, why have a separate SAPC? If it means that the SAPC can adopt a different stance from RoSPA, how do the RoSPA staff who may have to implement this reconcile this with their roles as employees of RoSPA.
Our main conclusion however in terms of the relationship with RoSPA is that the current arrangement mitigates against the driving forward of a SAPC agenda. While there is a significant commitment on the part of RoSPA staff supporting SAPC, there is always the position that they also have “day jobs” and that to actively promote the work of SAPC often conflicts with their role with RoSPA.
5.7. Image and identity
Our main conclusions are that first, the SAPC does not have a clear or well understood identity. Secondly, the image of the organisation is somewhat old fashioned. We also conclude from our review of the minutes of meetings and consultations, that the organisation can be over bureaucratic with some members more concerned with process and procedures rather than outputs and outcomes. The corporate identity, as it is, is old fashioned and would benefit from renewing.
6. Recommendations
In this section we set out our recommendations on the way forward for the Scottish Accident Prevention Council.
6.1. General
We recommend that the SAPC adopts a number of changes to the way it is structured and operates from its Annual General Meeting in October 2006, with a view to have all these in place by April 2007.
6.2. Aims and objectives
We would recommend that the Council streamlines its aims and objectives. Our suggestions would be:
Aim of the Council:
These aims and objectives should be incorporated into the organisation’s constitution, ensuring that these are drafted not to conflict with its charitable status.
6.3. Organisational structure
We would recommend that the Council streamlines its current organisational structure. This would involve a number of measures
| 6.3.1. | Replacing the three standing committees on Home Safety, Road Safety and Water and Leisure Safety with a more flexible short term working group structure which focuses on developing SAPC policy and good practice guidelines on specific Accident Prevention priorities. |
| 6.3.2. | Enlarging the Executive Committee to ensure accountability to the membership and draw on the experience and expertise of the membership in the overall management and direction of the Council. We would recommend an Executive or Management Committee of twelve elected members with scope to co-opt up to three individuals with appropriate skills and expertise. The Executive could be drawn from the membership, elected by the Council as a whole. Alternatively the Executive Committee could reflect the differing membership “constituencies” e.g.
We would recommend the replacement of the post of President with the Chair of the SAPC Executive Committee. This post could either be elected by the (Executive Committee – our preferred position), or by the membership as a whole. Committee members would serve for three years, with the scope for being re-elected. A system of electing a third of the members each year could be introduced to balance “new blood” with “continuity and stability”. |
| 6.3.3. | The Executive Committee could appoint sub-committees and working groups drawing on the membership as a whole to undertake specific pieces of work e.g.
Each sub-committee would be provided with written terms of reference. Working Groups would also have written terms of reference and also a timescale for the completion of their work. |
| 6.3.4. | Membership database In order to ensure that members are able to participate in the SAPC in a way that follows their interests and makes best use of their skills, experience, expertise and interest, we recommend the establishment of a database of members representatives which includes details of areas of accident and injury prevention and other “generic” and organisational issues e.g. training, marketing, media relations. This would also assist SAPC with the formation of sub-committees and working groups drawing on the most appropriate members. The recommended structure is illustrated diagrammatically in Appendix 1. |
6.6. Finances and resources
6.6.1. Relationship with RoSPA
We recommend that RoSPA discontinue in the role of providing the secretariat to the SAPC. Instead SAPC enter into a service level agreement (SLA) with RoSPA for it to provide specific development and organisational support. These relate to some of the activities set out in 6.5 above.
This SLA would be initially for three years. Both SAPC and RoSPA would have to give 12 months notice if they wish to terminate the agreement.
RoSPA would be credited with £40,000 per annum from SAPC (£35,000 from grant “in kind” from the Scottish Executive and £5,000 from its own direct income). This sum would be translated into a number of staff days with daily rates varying according to the level and seniority of staff working on behalf of SAPC and subsequently into specific services and projects.
6.6.2. SAPC staffing resources
We recommend that the SAPC engage its own member of staff (either as an employee or on a consultancy/freelance/self-employed basis). The role of this member of staff would be:
In the short term, we would envisage that this position could be part-time, though if successful, and this plan leads to the development of SAPC, could in due course become full-time.
We recommend that the SAPC uses its current cash reserves to “pump-prime” this position for a period of two years. After this period, it would be expected that this post should be self-financing from general income. We would also recommend that SAPC approach the Scottish Executive for financial support for the initial costs of this “change management” process.
6.6.3. Budget and business plan
The SAPC should adopt a three year business plan 2007-2010 based on this review and with a three year budget/cash flow projection. This should be supplemented by an annual work plan which will inform the Service Level Agreement with RoSPA. In Appendix 3, we set out a recommended Business Plan framework and a three year cash flow/budget.
6.7. Image and identity
The most frequent comment from consultees when discussing image and identity of the SAPC was “old fashioned”. We would recommend that as part of this proposed change that SAPC effectively “rebrands” itself and “relaunches” the organisation, with a target date of April 2007 to do this.
We note that there have been some discussions about the name of the organisation. In fact, it is recorded in one minute that the name “Accident Prevention Scotland” has been adopted, though we are not sure if this is the case.
We would recommend however that SAPC resists the current fashion to adopt, solely for the purposes of appearing modern, a new name. We believe that Scottish Accident Prevention Council projects an image of solidity and seriousness and should be retained as the name used to project the organisation with members, partners and the public.
However we would recommend that, as well as modernising the look of the web site, the corporate identity of the SAPC is also “overhauled” e.g. logo, letterheads and other aspects of corporate identity e.g. briefing materials, press releases, training resources.
We would also recommend that the style of internal papers e.g. correspondence with members, committee papers, minutes, correspondence is reviewed to ensure a more professional, succinct and friendly style.
6.8. Longer term measures
The world in which the SAPC operates is a rapidly changing one. The organisation will need to retain an approach and “culture” which recognises this. We would recommend that the SAPC considers the scope for developing close working relations with other bodies active in the field of Accident Prevention and Community Safety.
7. Action Plan for implementation
In this section we set out a step by step plan for the implementation of our report and recommendations:
7.1. Consideration of report by SAPC (August – October 2006)
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Suggested themes for SAPC Work Programme - 2007
The Extent and Cause of Injury and Death through Accidents in Scotland
Work to co-ordinate the existing methods of accident and data collection in Scotland and identify areas where better data collection and reporting are required.
Safer by Design
Much work has been done in relation to housing design to “design in safety and security”. The main focus of this however has been on external treatments and security devices including layout, location, locks and lighting. However there is a substantial body of experience of agencies working with people with disabilities, older people, people with visual impairment on how the interiors of homes can be designed, laid out and equipped to minimise the risk of accident.
SAPC could develop good practice guidance on this for home owners, landlords and developers which could make a significant contribution to accident prevention.
Don’t Drink and Drown
Undertake a study to assess the causal links between alcohol consumption and water activity related accidents and develop a strategy to minimise this.
Accident Prevention and Social Inclusion
There is some research evidence and much anecdotal evidence that poor and socially and economically disadvantaged people are at greater risk of injury and death from accidents. This piece of work would focus on developing SAPC policy on this and put forward positive action strategies to target accident prevention measures on those groups and individuals at greatest risk
Regeneration and Accident Prevention
Throughout Scotland, local authorities in partnership with other public and private sector bodies are undertaking major community and physical regeneration projects and schemes. The aim of this piece of work will to produce guidance for
regeneration partners in ways in which accident reduction and minimisation measure can be build into this work.
Appendix 3
SAPC Business Planning Framework and Budget/Cash Flow 2007-2010
1. Business Plan Framework
a. Name of Organisation
b. Statement of Aims and Objectives
c. Short history
d. Legal and Constitutional Status
e. Membership
f. Management
i. Details of Executive Committee
ii. Skills and experience of EC and members
g. Human and other resources
i. Own staff
ii. Service Level Agreement/s
h. Work Plan 2007-1010/Desciption of Activities
i. Finance – Income Sources and Budgets
j. Organisational Targets and Performance Measures
k. Working in Partnership
2. Outline Budget/Cash Flow 2007/2010 (Non-inflated)
| 2007/08 | 2008/09 | 2009/10 | |
| Income | |||
| Opening Balance | £40,000 | £20,500 | £8,500 |
| Membership Subscriptions | £15,000 | £15,000 | £20,000 |
| Conference(net) | £3,000 | £5,000 | £6,000 |
| Other Activities(net) | £3,000 | £5,000 | £8,000 |
| Other Grant Income | £5,000 | £5,000 | £5,000 |
| Sponsorship | £2,000 | £3,000 | £4,000 |
| Total | £68,000 | £53,500 | £51,500 |
| Expenditure | |||
| Own Staff Costs | £30,000 | £30,000 | £30,000 |
| SLA RoSPA | £5,000 | £5,000 | £5,000 |
| Admin & Office Costs | £5,000 | £5,000 | £5,000 |
| PR consultancy | £5,000 | £5,000 | £5,000 |
| Design Cost/web site | £2,500 | £0 | £0 |
| Total | £47,500 | £45,000 | £45,000 |
| Surplus/Deficit | £20,500 | £8,500 | £6,500 |